Top Adding - Legal

Many folks believe that food and drug company’s use deceptive advertising and we are const

According to USFDA, a combination product is one composed of any combination of a drug and device; biological product and device; drug and biological product

antly hearing of online scams and trickery in advertising these days. But did you know tha

; or drug, device, and biological product and fixed dose combination would include two or more combinations of drug.

Examples of combination products may in

the Government Regulators are culprits themselves of false and misleading advertising, pr

lude drug-coated devices, drugs packaged with delivery devices in medical kits, and drugs and devices packaged separately but intended to be used together.

ss releases and even have bogus information on their websites. Indeed they often sue compa

here is enormous increase in the number of combination products entering the market in the recent years. Combination products have proven advantages but fixe

ies and file false declarations and complaints in Federal Courts.

In fact in my opinion s

d dose combinations are still in the process of convincing regulatory authority on their advantages over the single ingredient formulations.

Combination pro

me of the most deceptive advertising on the Planet comes from the regulators who work to s

ucts have become life saving products for the pharmaceutical companies who doesn’t have many innovative molecules in their product pipeline and have been inc

care the piss out of consumers to justify their on-going budget. It should be quite eviden

easingly used in the product life cycle management. Even the companies having product patents are trying to extend their product life cycle through the combi

as the worst of it appears out of the blue right before Senatorial Hearings to get the pu

nation products and maximize the revenues. But the companies involved in this practice are overlooking that they are burdening the patients both economically

lic in a tizzy and the mass media hysteria takes it from there and of course increased bud

and physically. They need to rightly judge the benefits of the combination products and they have to even look at the risks involved when combining the produ

ets ensue.

Indeed in my observations, from my perspective and in my personal opinion (CYA

ts. Some of the combination products were well accepted by physicians while others suffered. Companies involved in development of combination products are fi

. There is no more dishonest press releases in the World than those of regulatory bodies w

ding difficulty in defining their combination products and facing various challenges from selecting a combination to marketing it.

Following aspects would a

ho are either doing the bidding for Senators, lobbyists, Companies, with huge interests ag

dd to the challenges in developing combination products:

Which markets to tap where the combination products can do fairly well?
Which combination prod

inst their competitors or the regulatory bodies who wish to prove they are doing something

cts are meaningful and rational?
Which therapeutic categories to select?
Which Combinations can address unmet needs of the patients?
Do combin

"Good" so they lie in press releases and send them out to 8,000 news agencies and outlets.

tions increase the patient compliance?
What would be the developing cost?
How to tackle the risks encountered during combination product developmen

So Dear, Academia, Socialist wannabe and Communistic leaning good for nothing Pinko; befo

t?

As combination products don't fit into the traditional categories of drugs, medical devices, or biological products, the USFDA is in the process of devel

e you go and crucify businesses, please tell me why the FTC attacked "Hooked on Phonics" w

ping new procedures for reviewing their safety, efficacy and quality.

Professional from academic institutions, pharmaceutical industries, health care indust

hen the Teacher's Union made waves with their Senators who then had the complaints initiat

y and representatives from various regulatory agencies are working out to design the regulatory requirements for manufacture and sale of combination products

d at the FTC; destroying that gentleman's business, program and all the good he was trying

.

As there is an increasing trend of the combination products companies manufacturing such products should be able to tackle the problems involved in the de

to do to help the world and stop illiteracy? Thank you FTC? As just one example. Oh you wa

elopment. They need to be wiser in analyzing the market trends and the regulatory requirements.

Companies that provide selfless information through particip

t more? You betcha! Got plenty, but the point is this article is to propel thought in 2007

tion in industry events and feedback to regulatory authorities would be able to face the challenges and will be successful in developing combination products

HTTP = HTML link (for blogs, profiles,phorums):
<a href="http://www.topadding.org.ua/article/131247/topadding-Deceptive-Advertising-Who-is-Worse-the-Scam-Artists-or-the-Regulators.html">Deceptive Advertising: Who is Worse, the Scam Artists or the Regulators?</a>

BB link (for phorums):
[url=http://www.topadding.org.ua/article/131247/topadding-Deceptive-Advertising-Who-is-Worse-the-Scam-Artists-or-the-Regulators.html]Deceptive Advertising: Who is Worse, the Scam Artists or the Regulators?[/url]

We sometimes forget that good business strategy is just as important online as it is off. Although the internet offers exciting new ventures for the entrepreneur, good business sense can keep a project going for the long haul. Here are six rules for business to keep an online business profitable.

Due to the widespread use of the Internet, business models have changed over the years.

Tags

Links

Top Adding - Deceptive Advertising: Who is Worse, the Scam Artists or the Regulators?

Related Articles: